The claim ledger / 1870–today

Claims do not become facts by repetition.

11 claims have crossed the publication threshold: each is dated, scoped, assigned an explicit evidence position, and linked to a public source record.

An entry records a proposition, not a verdict. Its wording defines the limit of what is being asserted.

Disputed and unsupported claims remain visible instead of being silently removed.

Search the public record

11 of 11 claims shown

1870–1913

2 claims

1905–1941

NKNW-C015

debt sovereignty / Dominican Republic / United States

The Dominican customs receivership

A US-appointed receivership collected Dominican customs revenue for debt service and constrained changes to public debt and import duties under the 1907 convention.

Evidence position

The 1907 convention directly establishes US appointment of the receiver, the revenue order, and restrictions on Dominican debt and tariff changes.

Status boundary
The available record supports the claim within its stated scope.
Evidence base
1 public record / single-source claim, limited to what that record directly establishes
Linked records

1910–1913

NKNW-C018

counterclaim / United States

Jekyll Island and Federal Reserve origin claims

The 1910 Jekyll Island meeting was secret and influenced the Aldrich reform proposal; that fact does not by itself establish the claim that private bankers own or secretly command the later Federal Reserve System.

Evidence position

The secret meeting and its influence on the Aldrich proposal are documented; the stronger claim of private ownership or secret command over the later Federal Reserve is not established.

Status boundary
Material evidence or interpretations conflict. The disagreement is part of the record.
Evidence base
1 public record / single-source claim, limited to what that record directly establishes
Linked records

1914–1944

1 claims

1930–today

NKNW-C023

counterclaim / International

What the BIS is—and is not

The BIS was created to administer settlements and foster central-bank cooperation; its documented institutional role does not establish popular claims of a secret private authority commanding national governments.

Evidence position

The BIS origin, ownership, mandate, and central-bank functions are documented; those facts do not establish a private authority commanding national governments.

Status boundary
Material evidence or interpretations conflict. The disagreement is part of the record.
Evidence base
1 public record / single-source claim, limited to what that record directly establishes
Linked records

1945–1979

1 claims

1971–1973

NKNW-C041

monetary power / United States / international

The end of dollar-gold convertibility

The United States unilaterally suspended official dollar convertibility into gold, helping end Bretton Woods fixed exchange rates and shift the monetary system toward fiat currencies and floating rates.

Evidence position

The suspension of official dollar-gold convertibility and the subsequent end of the Bretton Woods parity system are documented; motive and distribution require separate analysis.

Status boundary
The available record supports the claim within its stated scope.
Evidence base
1 public record / single-source claim, limited to what that record directly establishes
Linked records

1980–1999

4 claims

1980s–today

NKNW-C001

structural adjustment / International / named programmes

Programme lending can condition domestic policy choices

Disbursement or debt treatment can be linked to fiscal, monetary, trade, regulatory, and ownership conditions, transferring bargaining power toward external creditors in specific programmes.

Evidence position

Programme documents directly link external financing, monitoring, and specified policy actions. The finding is about bargaining power, not universal authorship or harm.

Status boundary
The available record supports the claim within its stated scope.
Evidence base
2 public records / multi-record basis; independence and shared underlying evidence still require inspection
Linked records

1980s–today

NKNW-C002

structural adjustment / International / named programmes

Fiscal consolidation can reduce public provision during adjustment

Adjustment can reduce or recompose public provision through expenditure ceilings, wage measures, subsidy changes, or revenue effects, but results vary by programme, composition, baseline, and crisis depth.

Evidence position

The record shows protected-spending targets alongside declining real per-capita social expenditure, import pressure on an uncompetitive industrial base, and sharply uneven poverty outcomes; the programme is not the only cause.

Status boundary
The direction or strength differs across cases, periods, or methods.
Evidence base
4 public records / multi-record basis; independence and shared underlying evidence still require inspection
Mixed recordPermanent link

1980s–today

NKNW-C003

structural adjustment / International / named transactions

Privatisation can change control of domestic assets

Privatisation associated with adjustment can shift ownership and control of domestic assets, including to external or concentrated owners, but must be traced transaction by transaction.

Evidence position

Programme records establish extensive privatisation and retrenchment; evaluations report both re-employment and serious failures in compensation and social protection.

Status boundary
The direction or strength differs across cases, periods, or methods.
Evidence base
2 public records / multi-record basis; independence and shared underlying evidence still require inspection
Linked records
Mixed recordPermanent link

1980s–today

NKNW-C004

structural adjustment / International / named reforms

Liberalisation can increase external exposure

Trade or capital liberalisation can increase exposure to external finance, price shocks, and import competition depending on sequencing, productive capacity, exchange regime, and stabilising institutions.

Evidence position

Liberalisation is documented. Imports and non-traditional exports both expanded, later reviews identify industrial displacement, and household outcomes differ across period and location; no universal effect is supported.

Status boundary
The direction or strength differs across cases, periods, or methods.
Evidence base
5 public records / multi-record basis; independence and shared underlying evidence still require inspection
Mixed recordPermanent link

2000–2009

1 claims

2008–today

NKNW-C063

crisis management / United States

TARP: rescue, repayment, and distribution

TARP stabilised parts of the financial system and other sectors through public risk-taking; programme components produced different recoveries, losses, beneficiaries, and counterfactual claims.

Evidence position

The statute delegated broad emergency discretion and official accounting distinguishes authorisation, disbursement, recovery, risk, and lifetime cost. Stabilisation, distribution, and moral hazard remain separate questions.

Status boundary
The direction or strength differs across cases, periods, or methods.
Evidence base
4 public records / multi-record basis; independence and shared underlying evidence still require inspection
Mixed recordPermanent link

2010–2019

1 claims

2013–2018

NKNW-C069

data and political power / United States / United Kingdom / Facebook ecosystem

Cambridge Analytica and political profiling

Regulatory findings establish deceptive harvesting of Facebook data for profiling and targeting; claims about decisive election effects require separate causal evidence.

Evidence position

The regulatory finding establishes deceptive data collection and profiling practices; it does not establish a decisive effect on an election result.

Status boundary
The available record supports the claim within its stated scope.
Evidence base
1 public record / single-source claim, limited to what that record directly establishes
Linked records

2020–today

1 claims

2022–today

NKNW-C071

financial sanctions / Russia / G7 / European Union / global reserve system

Sovereign reserves as a sanctions chokepoint

The immobilisation of Russian central-bank reserves demonstrated that foreign reserve access depends on legal jurisdictions and financial infrastructure controlled by other states.

Evidence position

The sanctions action establishes that reserve access can be blocked through jurisdictions and financial infrastructure controlled by other states; immobilisation is not confiscation.

Status boundary
The available record supports the claim within its stated scope.
Evidence base
1 public record / single-source claim, limited to what that record directly establishes
Linked records